Karyotype supporting Mugil curema Valenciennes, 1836 and Mugil gaimardianus Desmarest, 1831 (Mugilidae: Teleostei) as two valid nominal species

In this study, we present the karyotypic features of two taxa, curema and gaimardianus (genus Mugil), supposed to be synonyms by some authors. Their cytogenetic differences are conspicuous and unambiguous, providing evidence that Mugil curema and Mugil gaimardanus are two valid nominal species.

Bibliographic Details
Authors: Nirchio, Mauro, Cervigón, Fernando, Porto, Jorge Ivan Rebelo, Pérez, Julio Eduardo, Gómez, Juan Antonio, Villalaz, Janzel R.
Format: article
Status:Published version
Publication Date:2003
Country:Brasil
Institution:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
Repository:Repositório Institucional do INPA
Language:English
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio:1/16406
Online Access:https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/16406
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Fish
Karyotype
Taxonomy
Mugil
Mugil Curema
Mugil Gaimardianus
Mugilidae
Teleostei
Description
Summary:In this study, we present the karyotypic features of two taxa, curema and gaimardianus (genus Mugil), supposed to be synonyms by some authors. Their cytogenetic differences are conspicuous and unambiguous, providing evidence that Mugil curema and Mugil gaimardanus are two valid nominal species.