Karyotype supporting Mugil curema Valenciennes, 1836 and Mugil gaimardianus Desmarest, 1831 (Mugilidae: Teleostei) as two valid nominal species
In this study, we present the karyotypic features of two taxa, curema and gaimardianus (genus Mugil), supposed to be synonyms by some authors. Their cytogenetic differences are conspicuous and unambiguous, providing evidence that Mugil curema and Mugil gaimardanus are two valid nominal species.
| Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Status: | Published version |
| Publication Date: | 2003 |
| Country: | Brasil |
| Institution: | Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA) |
| Repository: | Repositório Institucional do INPA |
| Language: | English |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio:1/16406 |
| Online Access: | https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/16406 |
| Access Level: | Open access |
| Keyword: | Fish Karyotype Taxonomy Mugil Mugil Curema Mugil Gaimardianus Mugilidae Teleostei |
| Summary: | In this study, we present the karyotypic features of two taxa, curema and gaimardianus (genus Mugil), supposed to be synonyms by some authors. Their cytogenetic differences are conspicuous and unambiguous, providing evidence that Mugil curema and Mugil gaimardanus are two valid nominal species. |
|---|